PSN outage to last days

Yeah I can see Supaa having a meltdown : P .. wouldn't know about Mav since he deleted me -__-.

I don't mind since I play a lot of my games offline anyways, except for well BC2 and Blur. I just like being on to rent movies and such >_>.

Ohh and I will deff get PS+ if they add Party Chat. I was thinking about getting PS+ a little while ago, just that three month subscription to check it out and see if it's worth it.

Im just getting into Portal 2.

Other than that, I still got dante's inferno and and mortal kombat to play with.

Then I havent really done everything in any of the 3 god of war games... i completed each storyline and moved on... so still plenty of meat there.

Basically, fuck psn, im good without.

O and not to mention my x360 I bought off my brother that has a shitton of games to it.

Dante's Inferno, what a rip off of GoW : P.

It was a good game though.. I even got a little action figure with it xD

Yea tons of games are god of war ripoffs lol.

Hell, Battlefield is a Call of Duty ripoff but we still play it, right?

*teabag*

battlefield came first dumbass

NakidLadies wrote:

battlefield came first dumbass

Oh shit....

Lisha, what happened to playing NHL???

SpaceFox wrote:

Oh shit....

oh sheet waht?

No, Yoshi.

Call of Duty came first, and took full advantage of the console's superiority.

Battlefield came to dumb down the FPS experience for the PC crowd.

While CoD has always remained true to its standards, Battlefield sinks ever lower and lower, ruining what could be a great console experience by dumbing it down for PC losers who cant afford a ps3, and couldnt figure out how to work it even if they did have one.

Do somethin about it, faggot.

monkeystoot wrote:

Lisha, what happened to playing NHL???

I gave up Matt : (, I just don't like those new NHL games anymore.. '98 will always be my fav : P.

Gut_Tech wrote:

No, Yoshi.

Call of Duty came first, and took full advantage of the console's superiority.

Battlefield came to dumb down the FPS experience for the PC crowd.

While CoD has always remained true to its standards, Battlefield sinks ever lower and lower, ruining what could be a great console experience by dumbing it down for PC losers who cant afford a ps3, and couldnt figure out how to work it even if they did have one.

Do somethin about it, faggot.

ever heard of the game 1942 that came out in 2002? stfu faggot

and of course MOH came before both of those games...

Gut_Tech wrote:

No, Yoshi.

Call of Duty came first, and took full advantage of the console's superiority.

Battlefield came to dumb down the FPS experience for the PC crowd.

While CoD has always remained true to its standards, Battlefield sinks ever lower and lower, ruining what could be a great console experience by dumbing it down for PC losers who cant afford a ps3, and couldnt figure out how to work it even if they did have one.

Do somethin about it, faggot.

Gut, your e-peen is showing.

Look Im not here to spell out basic shit for derptards, so you'll just have to figure it out on your own.

But yes, Medal of Honor came out like 3 months before the first CoD game, and then the first Battlefield game directly copied Call of Duty in every way but dumbed it down for PC.

Gut's 100% correct, this is common knowledge to the vast majority of people. Just a couple of retards can't figure it out - they play a lot of Battlefield and don't give the better games a chance.

Here we once again see the failed troll attempting to mitigate his predicament with pictures.

Gut_Tech wrote:

Look Im not here to spell out basic shit for derptards, so you'll just have to figure it out on your own.

But yes, Medal of Honor came out like 3 months before the first CoD game, and then the first Battlefield game directly copied Call of Duty in every way but dumbed it down for PC.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Call_of_Duty
"Call of Duty is a video game based on the Quake III Arena engine (id Tech 3), and was released on October 29, 2003."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battlefield_(series)
"Battlefield 1942 was released on September 10, 2002, using the Refractor gaming engine, and introduced the "Conquest" gameplay mode, in which players fought for "capture points" throughout the map. Two expansion packs were released, The Road to Rome and Secret Weapons of WWII."

Uh-huh.

Fido wrote:

Here we once again see the failed troll attempting to mitigate his predicament with pictures.

someone has to be trolling, its a fact.

CptnShotgun wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Call_of_Duty
"Call of Duty is a video game based on the Quake III Arena engine (id Tech 3), and was released on October 29, 2003."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battlefield_(series)
"Battlefield 1942 was released on September 10, 2002, using the Refractor gaming engine, and introduced the "Conquest" gameplay mode, in which players fought for "capture points" throughout the map. Two expansion packs were released, The Road to Rome and Secret Weapons of WWII."

Uh-huh.

and MOH was 1999

Jesus Christ Im so much better at this than all of you.

And Im not even trying. This is like fucking kindergarten shit. Like I called you a poopy-pants and you start fucking crying, then CaptainFagGun randomly shows up outa nowhere and pulls his trousers down to try and prove that he isnt a fucking poopy-pants.

and halo was 2001

CptnShotgun wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Call_of_Duty
"Call of Duty is a video game based on the Quake III Arena engine (id Tech 3), and was released on October 29, 2003."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battlefield_(series)
"Battlefield 1942 was released on September 10, 2002, using the Refractor gaming engine, and introduced the "Conquest" gameplay mode, in which players fought for "capture points" throughout the map. Two expansion packs were released, The Road to Rome and Secret Weapons of WWII."

Uh-huh.

That's like an easy year of work for the people who made CoD to improve on everything in Battlefield and release a better game. Meanwhile the idiots who made Battlefield were like LOL LOOK THEY MADE A BETTER GAME but aw I'm lazy I don't wanna release more. Let's do expansion packs LOL and they'll buy it! But nobody did. Then CoD people were like "lol we'll show them" and released maps and expansions and shit and EVERYONE bought them. They made billions.

but gut was wrong, thats all i care about.

i agree CoD is a vetter game but im shit at it which is why its an awful game
and the only reason im shit at it is because i have never bothered to get the game on release.

the only CoD game im actually good at is WaW but thats like being good at clapping your hands

NakidLadies wrote:

but gut was wrong, thats all i care about.

i agree CoD is a vetter game but im shit at it which is why its an awful game
and the only reason im shit at it is because i have never bothered to get the game on release.

the only CoD game im actually good at is WaW but thats like being good at clapping your hands

What part was Gut wrong about? I think you just misread it.

You should really try to get a coD game at release. I had the same problem in Modern Warfail 2. I was average but it took months of playing. Got BO at release and now I'm up there and I can do good and enjoy it.

That's really all it is. Can't let them build up their skill from release, figure out which guns are best, get used to them, etc, and leave you in the dust. I think that's what turns people off of CoD. You know? They're not good at it... they play a few days... they get owned a lot... they think, aw, this game is dumb, it's just campers. Meanwhile they're using (in Ronin's case on Modern Warfail 2) heartbeat sensors and thermal scopes.