BF3 fact sheet released

one of the barbies is a writer for a gaming website and the vehicle,weapons,perks has been released



enjoy



http://zoknowsgaming.com/2011/08/16/battlefield-3-official-fact-sheet-weapons-vehicles/

Thats cool I didnt know they dumped the Apache for a Cobra, and they have little birds nice, wonder if they will have 50s on them

I posted this in the CQ vid thread

DTECH wrote:

they dumped the Apache for a Cobra,

OMFG IM AM NEVER PLAYING THI- owait I wasnt gonna play it anyway. Carry on.

ahhhhhhhhhhhh i didnt see anything about so i thought id post it

Apache will probably still be in the game in some way. If not in the original game then probably in Back to Karkand.

And the list isnt complete btw. Some stuff is missing like the M16A3.

muss1210 wrote:

ahhhhhhhhhhhh i didnt see anything about so i thought id post it

eh, it was in another thread... not it's own.

I should move this one too actually... maybe I will lol

spacefox wrote:

Apache will probably still be in the game in some way. If not in the original game then probably in Back to Karkand.

And the list isnt complete btw. Some stuff is missing like the M16A3.

I'm sure Dice won't make it any different just because it's a cobra and not an apache, just like the havoc and apache are similar in BC2. The M16A4 is there, it was actually in BC2 but DICE named it incorrectly I think.

I think the M16A2 like Bc2 says you have is actually an A4 version. The A4 has the detachable rail on the top while the A2 sight rail is part of the receiver. I could be wrong, ask Ronin, I think he was in the army.

Yeah Cobra will probably be similar to the Apache but choppers never feel completely the same.

And nope im pretty sure M16a3 is fully automatic, bc2's was 3 round burst.

the_Fetophagist wrote:

spacefox wrote:

Apache will probably still be in the game in some way. If not in the original game then probably in Back to Karkand.

And the list isnt complete btw. Some stuff is missing like the M16A3.

I'm sure Dice won't make it any different just because it's a cobra and not an apache, just like the havoc and apache are similar in BC2. The M16A4 is there, it was actually in BC2 but DICE named it incorrectly I think.

I think the M16A2 like Bc2 says you have is actually an A4 version. The A4 has the detachable rail on the top while the A2 sight rail is part of the receiver. I could be wrong, ask Ronin, I think he was in the army.

Yah, A2 the rear sight is part of the upper receiver. I never really cared though.... honestly some people make such a big deal about such stupid shit.

And lol wut? They apache and havok have similar stats... dmg, RoF, accuracy, armor..... but they handle hella different.

Havok is much more fluid

lol wut at what? I said it was similar in game and you basically just agreed with me. I think a lot of people will say that the apache feels more agile, unless you mean something else by saying that it's more fluid feeling.

I was just pointing out that they're including an M16 in the game so I didn't understand why space would be nitpicky about dice not putting a certain variant in.

Canister shells....lmao awesome

I see we again aint gonna get to have FULLY equipped vehicles, but must choose between it's secondaries via a specialization system again?
FML dice, really go choke to death.

Every single tank should come standard with ALL it's guns, ammo, and all machine guns, Specilizations should be things like Add-On ERA armor upgrades and targeting systems not strip it of it's basic weapons and make you "put them back on"

Other then that, my only complaint is that im seeing a lot of stuff (weapons) re-Used from BC and BC2.

> AN-94 Not accepted generally into service (tho i believe i read somewhere it is Rarely deployed by Spec ops?)
> AEK-971 I believe is only used in limited numbers by RU army security forces.
> M416 Is not actively deployed by US marines as far as i know, and surely not by RU forces.
> F2000 is not used by any of the forces represented?

and that's just assault rifles. I'm glad the XM-8's are gone. they've annoyed me a lot since i never liked using them plus the fact they never got past testing and development.

PS roni i know you are more informed on this military stuff if im mis-informed about any of the guns i mentioned plz fill me in.

IDK it just seems like DICE is being lazy. I would much rather have seen more of the SCAR varients for different classes then a bunch of Re-Used guns from BC (since i know for a fact the SCAR series is heavily used by some US forces, especially Navy SEALS and Marine MEU or force recon units seem to use them a lot from the documentaries i've seen due to their versatility.

xALIENAx wrote:

I see we again aint gonna get to have FULLY equipped vehicles, but must choose between it's secondaries via a specialization system again?
FML dice, really go choke to death.

Every single tank should come standard with ALL it's guns, ammo, and all machine guns, Specilizations should be things like Add-On ERA armor upgrades and targeting systems not strip it of it's basic weapons and make you "put them back on"

Other then that, my only complaint is that im seeing a lot of stuff (weapons) re-Used from BC and BC2.

> AN-94 Not accepted generally into service (tho i believe i read somewhere it is Rarely deployed by Spec ops?)
> AEK-971 I believe is only used in limited numbers by RU army security forces.
> M416 Is not actively deployed by US marines as far as i know, and surely not by RU forces.
> F2000 is not used by any of the forces represented?

and that's just assault rifles. I'm glad the XM-8's are gone. they've annoyed me a lot since i never liked using them plus the fact they never got past testing and development.

PS roni i know you are more informed on this military stuff if im mis-informed about any of the guns i mentioned plz fill me in.

IDK it just seems like DICE is being lazy. I would much rather have seen more of the SCAR varients for different classes then a bunch of Re-Used guns from BC (since i know for a fact the SCAR series is heavily used by some US forces, especially Navy SEALS and Marine MEU or force recon units seem to use them a lot from the documentaries i've seen due to their versatility.

tl;dr

Armchair generals ftl.

ffs alien.... not that fuckin serious....

kinda suck if the only options were US Marine and RU Spec op weapons

jesus cry some more... you're tears make me smile

RoninHo'in wrote:

ffs alien.... not that fuckin serious....

kinda suck if the only options were US Marine and RU Spec op weapons

jesus cry some more... you're tears make me smile

+1

And the AN94 is like my child. I'd be pissed if it wasnt in BF3.

spacefox wrote:

+1

And the AN94 is like my child. I'd be pissed if it wasnt in BF3.

I'm not getting BF3.

DGAF wrote:

I'm not getting BF3.

How are you still in SnM then?

RoninHo'in wrote:

ffs alien.... not that fuckin serious....

kinda suck if the only options were US Marine and RU Spec op weapons

jesus cry some more... you're tears make me smile

haha thats some cold shit.

well fuck, they've got most the marine basics, I'd rather have more variety then a limited set.... and the more rare and eclectic a gun is, generally the more bad ass it is to kill people with IMO

Quote :

more rare and eclectic a gun is

That rare and eclectic enough for you?

Perfect, they should add it

Well, at least Gut will have a legitimate complaint when his bullets do nothing.

^Go take a bubble bath with a rubber ducky shaped like a dick, you rectal douching cock avenger.

RoninHo'in wrote:

ffs alien.... not that fuckin serious....

kinda suck if the only options were US Marine and RU Spec op weapons

jesus cry some more... you're tears make me smile

I'm not even Upset that they're in- I'm upset at the Lack of a bunch of new stuff and return of lame "features". They could Mix it up with alot of different guns and varients and what not rather they are in use or not by the faction portrayed but imho reusing the same guns and models 3 games in a row is lazy as hell.